There’s a narrative floating around: tools like Hubbl will “analyze your Salesforce org” and give you everything you need to run it better.

Here’s the part that usually gets left out: most of those scans only look at a narrow slice of metadata, often focused on things like Apex and a handful of configuration types. Which means you’re making “whole-org” decisions based on a fraction of the picture.

Unlike Hubbl, Sweep was built for full metadata visibility.

Instead of scanning a sliver of your org and calling it done, Sweep transforms 100% of your Salesforce metadata into an adaptive, agentic workspace. It doesn’t just tell you what’s wrong; it helps you understand it, map it, and fix it continuously.

Let’s walk through five reasons Salesforce teams are choosing Sweep over Hubbl.

1. Whole-org visibility vs. narrow metadata snapshots

Hubbl’s diagnostics look at part of your org. A slice. A segment. A subset. You get insights, but only from the metadata types the scan covers. If your issue sits in a hidden dependency, a field relationship, a routing rule, a CRMA asset, or any of the countless pieces outside the scan… that context is missing.

Sweep analyzes the entire metadata graph, including all of the relationships, dependencies, automations, and weird corners of your org. The metadata graph is then mapped into real-time documentation and impact analysis. When something breaks (or is about to), you see exactly what’s connected.

Sweep customers routinely cut investigation time by up to 99% because they’re not guessing which corner of the org to inspect. They see the full graph, instantly.

2. Process Mapping: Sweep’s Metadata Maps vs. Hubbl’s Predefined Flows

Sweep’s Metadata Mapping Agents analyze one hundred percent of your metadata and create maps that reflect how your org actually behaves. You can ask Sweep to visualize a Flow, an assignment pattern, a routing structure or the entire dependency chain for a specific field. The map is generated on demand, tailored to your question and built from your live metadata graph. You are not limited to operational workflow definitions: you can map technical systems, GTM processes, architecture patterns or anything else you need to understand. This creates a level of clarity that feels more like exploring the system than reviewing a report.

Hubbl’s process analytics give you a predefined picture of how records move through a business process. These diagrams are useful for understanding throughput and identifying slow stages, but they are locked to the process definitions Hubbl supports. You cannot reshape the view or generate a map for a configuration, automation or relationship that sits outside the product’s fixed structure.

Hubbl helps you understand one type of process. Sweep helps you understand your entire org.

3. Visualization: Agentic, customizable artifacts vs. static snapshots

Sweep’s Metadata Agents generate artifacts that are dynamic, interactive and specific to your needs. You can create a map for any configuration or dependency in your org simply by describing what you want to see.

The system produces a view that you can click into, explore in detail and modify as you go. These artifacts can be used to plan Flow migrations, evaluate technical debt, design new systems, document logic for future admins or create mini applications that guide a team through cleanup or optimization work. Each artifact is powered by live metadata and becomes a working surface for investigation, planning and execution.

Hubbl’s visualizations are polished and show you the flow of records, average durations and transition patterns. The visuals are helpful for analysis and benchmarking, but they do not change shape based on what you want to learn. They are static snapshots. If you need a different perspective or want to explore how a configuration connects to the rest of your org, you are still switching to other tools and reconstructing the story manually.

4. Embedded action & data quality vs. “insights only”

Sweep doesn’t stop at “Here’s what’s wrong.” It includes an execution layer for deduplication & matching, routing and assignment, alerts for Slack or Teams, and the ability to build and deploy automations directly from the workspace. With this in place, your workflow becomes find an issue, understand the impact, fix it, monitor it, and move on. You get a unified workspace, so you don’t have to export or recreate logic elsewhere.

Hubbl, on the other hand, surfaces issues and recommendations but does not provide a native execution layer for fixing data models, building automations, or enforcing data quality. You have to pull their reports, interpret their findings, implement fixes outside of Hubbl, and test while hoping nothing breaks. Sweep closes the loop. Hubbl starts it.

5. An agentic workspace that replaces a stack of tools

Most Salesforce teams are juggling: a process-mapping tool, a documentation tool, a routing/automation tool, a data quality / dedupe tool, an impact analysis tool, and still asking in Slack, “Does anyone know what this Flow does?” Sweep becomes the single workspace where teams: document their org automatically, map processes visually with AI, leverage context-aware Metadata Agents for precise diagnoses and guided fixes, design and deploy automations, monitor long-term health, and collaborate across Admin, RevOps, Systems, and Leadership.

Hubbl fits into a world where you’re still stitching together separate tooling, manual documentation, one-off audits. It helps you see a little more — but it doesn’t replace nearly as much.

Sweep customers report:

• 50% faster delivery on GTM & systems projects
• 3–5 tool consolidation
• 20+ hours/week returned to the team

And that, in the end, is the difference.